|
|
Workshops: Stories
Workshop 2: Changing Stories:
Attending to Early Modern Lesbianisms
Conveners:
- Harriette Andreadis, Texas A & M University
- Susan S. Lanser, University of Maryland
- Valerie Traub, University of Michigan
- Elizabeth Wahl, Independent Scholar affiliated
with Stanford University
During the past decade, a burgeoning
scholarship on female homoeroticism has deepened and complicated the study
of gender and sexuality in the early modern period. By investigating that
scholarship, "Changing Stories: Attending to Early Modern Lesbianisms"
hoped to advance the study of female homoeroticism within the larger frameworks
of feminist teaching and scholarship. Considering both the new knowledge
and its sites of contention, we asked what is gained and lost in formulating
developmental narratives about female homoeroticism in the period from
1500 to 1800. We examined differences of country and class, influences
across cultures, and shifts in terminology that may have inflected and
inflicted historical change. At the same time, we called into question
the very notion of "story" as a way of thinking about early modern scholarship
on female homoeroticism. In so doing, we returned to crucial questions
of methodology, asking how such issues as identity politics, evidence,
and periodization have created the "stories" of our field.
Our inquiry attended to texts by both
men and women from several European countries, in discursive fields ranging
of from medicine, science, cartography, law, and religion to letters,
memoirs, fiction, and poetry. We hoped both to provide useful materials
for teaching and research on "lesbianisms" and to strengthen the interdependence
of sex, gender, and sexuality in the study of early modernity.
The workshop began with five-minute
position papers from each of the organizers, followed by discussion of
questions sent to participants in advance. We then invited additional
topics for consideration, followed by a collective sharing of resources
for teaching and scholarship. Advance packets included discussion questions,
selections from the work of each of the organizers, and a bibliography
of current work in the field.
|